Are you applying for a mortgage loan? Lenders will almost certainly look at your classic FICO score. Scores by its rival, FICO, have been around the longest and are considered the industry standard, which, according to Consumer Reports, means anybody else’s numbers are “unlikely to be the scores lenders use to make lending decisions.”īut this can’t illustrate the broader problem, which is how unbelievably patchwork the system is. This is partly because, as even Credit Karma acknowledged to Fast Company, “there are dozens, if not hundreds, of scoring models.” The one chosen by Credit Karma, Credit Sesame, and TransUnion is called VantageScore. It notes that Credit Karma, Credit Sesame, Experian, and TransUnion only give customers access to a single credit score, and the odds are low that it’s the one lenders look at. Looking at five of the biggest apps that provide this service (Credit Karma, Experian Credit Report, Credit Sesame, myFICO, and TransUnion: Score & Report), the report argues that the scores they give you aren’t terribly useful-and, worse, that many of them routinely solicit customers to apply for additional credit or buy new financial services that, as Consumer Reports puts it, “are not necessarily in the users’ best interests.” However, a new review of these services by Consumer Reports suggests otherwise.
SCORELAND MAGAZINE MODELS LIST FULL
An entire industry has emerged to try to bridge this gap, full of companies promising not only to give consumers access to the scores lenders rely on, but also to kick in personalized financial advice that will help raise those scores.
But credit scores are calculated by a different set of companies, using models that each claims makes theirs better. However, many can be purchased used either from a private seller or car lot, or via auction.Those reports are compiled by the three major credit bureaus-Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax. Only a few of the models on the list remain in production. Here's how the full list shakes out from worst reliability to best:
It also had the lowest industry review score on the list at 3.4. While the Maserati GranTurismo earned its score by having the lowest rate of first-time passes, with just 82.2 percent passing their initial test. It has had 18 recalls in the last seven years and performed poorly on the industry review score with a 4.1, below the industry average of 4.5.ĭespite its high review score, 4.8, the Porsche 911 is ranked as the second-least reliable car on the list due its 17 recalls and relatively poor MOT pass rate, with just 87 percent passing on the first go. The most unreliable supercar, according to USwitch scoring, is the Mercedes-AMG GT. The two least reliable models had over a dozen recalls each while the third place car earned its position by being poorly reviewed and having a low MOT pass rate.
Those scores were then averaged to produce a final score with 10 being a perfect score. Cars can be recalled for a number of reasons but most notably when there's a serious safety issue.Įach supercar was then given a final score out of 10 for the first two categories and out of five for the reviews. Uswitch calculated recalls amounts dating back to 1992 using the GOV.UK's check vehicle recalls service. However, after years of saving for their dream car, the last thing they want is it to be unreliable," said Uswitch auto insurance expert Florence Codjoe. "For petrol heads around the world, the peak in their life and career is when they can afford a supercar.
Read more Porsche's New 1,073-HP Concept is a Sustainability-Focused Sports Car